[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Re: SVN database is a lot bigger than PVCS database

From: Andy Levy <andy.levy_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 09:51:19 -0400

On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 09:01, Seak, T. F.<lapsap7+svn_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for your reply.
>
>> I'd guess it is the importer.  It probably did not create branches and
>> tags by copying.
>
> How could I check if it's the case?  SVN is already in production, it's unfortunately not possible to do the migration again.  Anything I could do now to reduce the size?

Look at the verbose log of one of your branches or tags. svn log -v
--stop-on-copy. You should see a something like this:

svn log URL_TO_TAG -v --stop-on-copy
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r4258 | USER | 2009-06-18 20:48:59 -0400 (Thu, 18 Jun 2009) | 1 line
Changed paths:
   A PATH_TO_TAG (from OTHER_PATH:4257)

LOGMESSAGE

If you don't see that, then you probably didn't get a cheap copy,
which will bloat the repository as a result.

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=2374439

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-07-22 15:52:12 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.