On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 11:44:05AM +0100, Barry Scott wrote:
> On 19 Jul 2009, at 11:34, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 10:20:19AM +1200, Talden wrote:
> >>> You can't expect Subversion to update any items to HEAD during
> >>> a commit expect those being committed. When the commit is confirmed
> >>> by the server, the client can infer the latest state of items
> >>> it has just committed, but it has no idea about any other items.
> >>> The other items need to be checked for pending updates separately.
> >>> And that's what "svn update" is for.
> >>
> >> Is that actually true if your WC revision is X and the server
> >> response
> >> to a commit reports revision X+1 was committed? Surely in this case
> >> updating all parts of the WC that are revision X can be bumped to
> >> revision X+1.
> >
> > Yeah, that could probably be done, but evidently isn't being
> > done right now.
>
> Can I raise this in bug track as a problem to fix?
Please first bring it up on the dev@ list to gather feedback
from the collective about this idea. Not all ideas turn out
to be as good as they look on the surface.
Stefan
Received on 2009-07-19 13:06:33 CEST