On 16/07/2009 14:12, Andy Levy wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 14:08, Christopher Clarke<tigris.org_at_fuscata.com> wrote:
>> On 16/07/2009 13:26, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>>> You keep asking us to fix this problem from within Subversion,
>>> but have not yet responded to my questions and suggestions about how
>>> your own process could be tweaked in order to avoid this problem.
>> I am asking you to add a feature.
>>
>> The fact is that this: There are valid reasons to remove an item from
>> version control without deleting it from working copies.
>>
>> There are a number of scenarios where I would want to do this, in
>> addition to the examples I gave. It's not productive to focus on the
>> examples.
>
> Yes it is. Before anything can be implemented, or even designed, the
> use cases, advantages, potential problems, logical "holes", etc. need
> to be fully understood.
Ok, start with this one: add item, commit, realize item should not have
been placed under version control, curse own stupidity, "unadd", ignore,
commit
>> Search the 'net and you will find a lot of other people who have the
>> same request.
>
> Links, please (you seem to have already found them, why duplicate the effort?).
oic, duplicating effort is bad for you, but ok for my team? ;-)
http://www.google.com/search?q=svn+remove+without+deleting+local
Cheers,
Chris
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=2371845
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-07-16 20:25:11 CEST