Re: Pre-commit hook

I would prefer a CI system such as Hudson that polls svn and checks
out the scripts and runs them against your database.

using a pre-commit or post-commit hook is tight coupling your CI with
your source control aka a bad thing

what happens when the database is down and you've left on holidays for
two weeks? nobody can commit

Sent from my [rhymes with myPod] ;-)

On 10 Jul 2009, at 18:15, Scott Vickery <svickery_at_cavucorp.com> wrote:

> I have a process in place that sanity checks SQL scripts. The user
> can take a list set of scripts which are then run against a series
> of databases to see if they run. The user is given feedback as they
> run. If the scripts fail, the user is told which database the
> script failed against.
>
> I want to put that process in place as pre-commit hook. So far so
> good. But, I would like to provide real time progress to the user
> that did the commit.
>
> Any ideas on how I could pull this off? AFAIK, the pre commit hook
> is only run on the server, and, there is no way for the user to see
> it. Correct?
>
> Thanks,
> Scott

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=2369908

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-07-10 20:03:09 CEST