[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: FSFS packing: experiences?

From: Bolstridge, Andrew <andy.bolstridge_at_intergraph.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:00:26 +0100

> On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 08:44, Johan
> Corveleyn<johan.corveleyn_at_uz.kuleuven.ac.be> wrote:
> > Has anyone here used the FSFS packing feature of 1.6?
> > http://subversion.tigris.org/svn_1.6_releasenotes.html#fsfs-packing
> >

> > - Does it improve performance of certain operations (that are heavy
> on server-IO)? I would hope it improves log and annotate performance
> (these need to crawl a lot of rev files on the server). Does it?
> >

I don't think so, I've not seen any performance improvements using it.
However, bear in mind that revprops are not packed - only revisions, so
log performance will not be affected at all anyway.

It is very useful for making backups, the backup server has a LOT less
files to copy now, and that goes quicker.

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=2363226

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-06-18 17:01:31 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.