[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: any rationale for new installs using Berkeley DB?

From: Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:10:41 -0400

On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Robert P. J. Day<rpjday_at_crashcourse.ca> wrote:
> for brand new installs that have no need for backward compatibility
> of any kind, is there any reason *not* to use FSFS as opposed to BDB?

In our CollabNet Subversion binaries we only include support for FSFS
because we think the answer is No. There are some nice things about
BDB, but FSFS is the way to go for virtually everyone. 

-- 
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=2361381
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-06-11 19:11:41 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.