RE: Using memcached with FSFS repositories

> > If it's really a checkout, I think it's normal that you don't see an
> > improvement (especially if it's with a windows client). In my
> > experience, a checkout (or update) on Windows is mainly client-side
> > cpu-bound (also heavy on IO, but mainly constrained by cpu). Could
> > you verify this?
>
> The Windows client was a high end workstation (4 cores, 4G ram, 80+M
> sustained I/O capability, Windows XP.) CPU and I/O were monitored
> on the client and nowhere near max during most of the test.

By maxed on cpu I mean just one core of course. On my pc (Windows XP, 2.8Ghz Pentium D (2 cores? or hyperthreading or something like that), 2G ram), the svn client (both TortoiseSVN and svn CLI client from SlikSVN) took one core, i.e. 50% cpu. This actually happened in bursts, every once in a while it would get a breather (during which one of the server cpus was maxed out (one httpd child)). Most of the time it was the client side that was maxed out though.

Johan

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=2355814

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-05-27 17:57:28 CEST