On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 12:26:26PM +0800, BianChui wrote:
> That is not a TortoiseSVN only problem. I tryed other clients, the
> result is same.
Yes, that's what I said.
I said:
So far, all reports I've seen were specific to Windows, I think.
But not specific to TortoiseSVN.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
My question was whether anyone could reproduce this problem
on an OS other than Windows yet.
> And that is not an old problem, old client do not have that problem.
Yup.
Stefan
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Stefan Sperling" <stsp_at_elego.de>
> To: "bianchui" <ysbcg_at_sohu.com>
> Cc: <users_at_subversion.tigris.org>
> Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 10:07 PM
> Subject: Re: Possibility new memory leak of 1.6.x Subversion
>
>
> > On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 09:27:18AM +0800, bianchui wrote:
> >> I use TortoiseSVN 1.5.5 with Svbversion 1.5.4 for about half years. I
> >> usually add thousands of files and commit all of them at same time.
> >> Several days ago I update subversion to 1.6.1 and that work cannot be
> >> done.
> >
> >> I do a test. Commit about 18000 files, modified or add.
> >> In TortoiseSVN 1.5.5 that with Svbversion 1.5.4, the commit work can be
> >> done use about 580M of memory, and very high speed, about send tens of
> >> files content per second.
> >> In TortoiseSVN 1.6.1 that with Svbversion 1.6.1, the client crash with a
> >> memory of 2G, and about send one file content per second.
> >
> > Yep, there is a problem, and the reports about it keep coming in
> > nearly every day now, probably because more and more people upgrade
> > to 1.6 and encounter this problem.
> >
> > Please take a look at issue #1964:
> > http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1964
> >
> >> I use TortoiseSVN as my client.
> >
> > Has anyone seen this on Linux yet?
> > So far, all reports I've seen were specific to Windows, I think.
> > But not specific to TortoiseSVN.
> >
> > Stefan
> >
Received on 2009-05-24 13:48:04 CEST