[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Using memcached with FSFS repositories

From: <kmradke_at_rockwellcollins.com>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 15:57:45 -0500

Blair Zajac <blair_at_orcaware.com> wrote on 05/18/2009 03:52:17 PM:
> kmradke_at_rockwellcollins.com wrote:
> >
> > Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com> wrote on 05/13/2009 11:37:57 AM:
> > > On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Chris Lieb
> > > <chris.lieb+nospam_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
>
> > I also noticed if no memcached servers were running, but a repository
> > was configured to use it, a checkout would fail during the checkout
> > of the first directory. It probably should continue to work as
> > if no cache was configured instead of failing...
> >
> > Anyone else see some better results?
>
> Out of curiosity, did you see a decrease in the mount of IO to the
> disk that the
> repository is on?

I suspect yes, but I wasn't able to measure it. (I haven't been
able to figure out how to measure I/O to our SAN...)

I may repeat the tests on my linux machine where I'll have the
tools needed to measure the disk I/O changes...

Kevin R.

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=2303421

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-05-18 22:58:40 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.