Irfan Sayed wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby (R12y) <
> mihamina_at_lab.vectoris.fr> wrote:
>
>> On 05/18/2009 03:31 PM, Bolstridge, Andrew wrote:
>>> If you want true multi-master synchronisation, then you need to look at
>>> something like SVK.
>> In the use case of Irfan, is SVN really suited?
>> A thought about another 3-letter tool...;-)
>>
>> --
>> Chef de projet chez Vectoris
>> Phone: +261 33 11 207 36
>> System: xUbuntu 8.10 with almost all from package install
>> http://www.google.com/search?q=mihamina+rakotomandimby
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=2299497
>>
>> To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [
>> users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
>
>
> if any organisation need multisite environment then they can not opt
> subversion bec. by default it does not support true multimaster multisite
> setup. if subversion is the choice then i think WANDSICO needs to be choosen
> to achieve the multisite setup OR otherwise discard subversion and go for
> clearcase
If you don't have reasonable network connectivity or you have a very
large number of developers at several different locations you might need
Wandisco or the proxy/svnsync setup. Most places do fine with a
central repository and remote developers. After the initial checkout,
subversion is very efficient at commits and updates, sending only the
changes over the network. Try it and time it before deciding it won't
work for you - and if the time is a problem, compare the price and other
advantages of increasing network bandwidth to other solutions to the
problem.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell_at_gmail.com
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=2299661
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-05-18 15:01:36 CEST