Google for JavaHL Ubuntu 9.04 and there are some easy instructions.
Use to link.
Sent from my iPhone
On May 15, 2009, at 6:11 PM, Scott Palmer <swpalmer_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 8:48 AM, Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de>
> wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 09:01:57PM -0400, Scott Palmer wrote:
> > Sorry.. that was me replying via the web form...
>
> No worries.
>
> What strikes me is that you have libtool 2.2.6 on your system.
> I have 1.5.6 on Debian stable, and I get no such errors.
>
> It seems like this issue has been reported to the APR developers
> last year by Arfever (one of our developers):
> http://marc.info/?l=apr-dev&m=120630072732498
>
> And it looks like the problem has been worked on recently in APR
> by Justin and Joe (also two of our developers :)
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/apr/apr/trunk/buildconf?view=log
>
> So I guess your options are:
>
> 1) Use a newer APR (i.e. get it from trunk and hope it'll work)
> 2) Install libtool 1.5 somewhere and use that to build APR-1.3.3.
> 3) Install the libapr1-dev package provided by Ubuntu instead of
> compiling APR yourself. There's also debug symbols in libapr1-dbg,
> if you need them.
> 4) Wait for new APR release and hope it'll fix this.
>
> Tried option 1, much better... but still fails..
> ...
> checking for odbc/sql.h... no
> checking Expat 1.95.x... no
> checking old Debian-packaged expat... no
> checking old FreeBSD-packaged expat... no
> checking Expat 1.0/1.1... no
> setting LDFLAGS to "-L/usr/local/lib"
> setting INCLUDES to "-I/usr/local/include"
> checking Expat 1.95.x in /usr/local... no
> nulling LDFLAGS
> nulling INCLUDES
> configuring package in xml/expat now
> /bin/bash: /home/scott/subversion-1.6.2/apr/xml/expat/configure: No
> such file or directory
> configure failed for xml/expat
> configure failed for apr
>
> Bummer.
>
> This happens all the time. I'm basically hitting the wall that I
> inevitably hit when trying to get anything done on Linux - there are
> so many interdependencies that it's impossible to resolve them... if
> it isn't already done by the maintainers of the disto, forget it.
> I'm just surprised that Ubuntu didn't have 1.6 available to
> install. We're already on 1.6.2 and they don't have 1.6.0. I'll
> save my rant about how ridiculous it is to not distribute official
> binaries for another day ;-)
>
> Thanks for the help, there is no way I would make any progress with
> out it (and I'm a professional developer with a degree in Computer
> Engineering).
>
> Scott
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=2275826
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-05-16 01:41:24 CEST