We moved from StarTeam to Subversion over 5 years ago. StarTeam was
difficult to use at best and horrible to administer. Subversion even at
version 0.9 was way better than StarTeam.
With Subversion our build time went from about 15 minutes to 5.
Both developers and administrators had a much easier time working with
Subversion
-----Original Message-----
From: webpost_at_tigris.org [mailto:webpost_at_tigris.org]
Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 12:44 PM
To: users_at_subversion.tigris.org; Greg Thomas
Subject: RE: Subversion vs. StarTeam
We are moving away from StarTeam. Each upgrade got more difficult to
do. It was as if Borland didn't really want you to do the upgrade
instead of paying them to do it. After we almost pried an upgrade
procedure from them for 2008 MSDE from 2005 R2 MSDE we discovered some
bugs during our upgrade test. The show stopper was that the update
status would sometimes not be able to resloved a freshly checked out
file to a current status. SVN is the new tool around here we are
looking to move to.
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageI
d=2273981
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail:
[users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Join us for UC4 Integrate 2009, November 8 - 12, San Diego, California.
This email (including any attachments) may contain information which is privileged, confidential, or protected. If you are not the intended recipient, note that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this message and attached files is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this email and any attached files.
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=2275548
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-05-16 00:58:30 CEST