[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: Subversion vs. StarTeam

From: <webpost_at_tigris.org>
Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 12:52:10 -0700 (PDT)

I bet its not free. Once you get hooked the price goes way up. We started out much cheaper. Borland desupports versions and jacks the support cost up according to how hooked they think you are. Ours support increased by a factor of about 4 one year.

> After much hang-wringing by the local PHBs at work, I finally
> persuaded them to go for Subversion as a SCM solution.
>
> Then, someone did a deal with Borland that gave us access to StarTeam
> for free.
>
> So, the question I'm now being asked is - why Subversion and not
> StarTeam, given that their purchase cost (to us, at least) is the
> same.
>
> Has anyone done a comparison of the two - does anyone have any
> comments, good or bad, about StarTeam?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Greg
> --
> This post represents the views of the author and does
> not necessarily accurately represent the views of BT.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_subversion.tigris.org

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=2274063

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-05-15 22:29:36 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.