Re: Request: Specifications / Requirements that only svn can meet
From: Blair Zajac <blair_at_orcaware.com>
Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 11:27:28 -0700
On May 8, 2009, at 1:15 PM, webpost_at_tigris.org wrote:
> Folks,
How about:
- Has support for write-through proxies that allow you to have remote
- Supports hot backups of the repository; no down time is required.
- Supports mirroring/backup repositories that will have a copy of any
- Support on all major platforms:
- Integrates into all major ticket tracking systems, i.e.
- Integrates into all major IDEs
- Very large ecosystem around it.
- No vendor lock-in. No risk that the product will go away and you'll
- Provides bindings so additional tools can be scripted to it in
- Provides a multi-layer abstraction where code can be written to any
- Supports constant time branching and tagging operations
- Supports disconnected operations where the client doesn't have to
- Requires a very light server infrastructure is required. Only a
- Supports both the lock-modify-unlock and copy-modify-merge models.
- Supports pulling code in from remote repositories so a single piece
- Supports all the different authentication models that Apache and
Regards,
-- Blair Zajac, Ph.D. CTO, OrcaWare Technologies <blair_at_orcaware.com> Subversion training, consulting and support http://www.orcaware.com/svn/ ------------------------------------------------------ http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=2149568 To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].Received on 2009-05-09 20:28:37 CEST |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.