personally, i find trac's svn-browsing very convenient and intuitive,
for example compared to viewvc 1.0.3.
the good thing is that using trac is not incompatible with other viewers.
2009/5/5 Ed Hillmann <ed.hillmann_at_gmail.com>:
> On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 6:21 AM, Albert Shih <Albert.Shih_at_obspm.fr> wrote:
>> Hi all
>>
>> I search some «websvn» application but
>>
>> I want web application access through svn not directly access (like trac,
>> viewvc) to my svn repository because I've many repository with complexe ACL, and I don't
>> like to put in many place those ACL. So I want my subversion server
>> manage that.
>>
>> I don't need many feature, just for view the source (and diff).
>>
>> Any suggestion ?
>>
>> Regards.
>>
>
> Hi Albert. I've been using sventon (http://www.sventon.org/) and am
> pretty happy with it. I found it easier to set up (compared to
> ViewVC), and it doesn't require direct access to the subversion
> repository. It also runs in tomcat, which is what we use internally
> for our development pages in-house. So, for us, it fit the bill.
>
> Hope this helps
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=2060839
>
> To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
>
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=2061645
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-05-05 01:37:04 CEST