RE: svn????????
From: Johan Corveleyn <johan.corveleyn_at_uz.kuleuven.ac.be>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 15:51:38 +0200
Well that would be fine, except for security: you'd need to have a generic "build user" (not corresponding to a real person), with fixed password, that has write access to the repository (needs to commit version info, make branches, tags, ...). In our case this means this "user" has to exist in our LDAP in the developers group (only that LDAP group has write access currently).
Our sysadmins don't like such generic user accounts (for one thing: their password tends to be fixed over time to help all the automation, contrary to normal accounts, which are forced to change their password every x months).
That's why we thought: why not let every developer build under his own account (but share the WC to speed up things), and avoid this whole issue.
Johan
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Bob Archer wrote:
Or start with something like hudson and let it run your automation.
-- Les Mikesell lesmikesell_at_gmail.com ------------------------------------------------------ http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=1995411 To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].Received on 2009-04-30 15:52:40 CEST |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.