RE: svn????????
From: Johan Corveleyn <johan.corveleyn_at_uz.kuleuven.ac.be>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 01:21:40 +0200
Hmmm, we were planning to do this in the following scenario:
This "build WC" isn't changed a lot, just as part of our build process (update, create new branch, adjust some externals, change versioninfo file and commit, ...). Everyone does this under his own user account (so we have some trace of who made the build etc), and it's never done concurrently (there is lockfile to make sure of this). We prefer sharing the WC to save time and diskspace on our build machine. To avoid file permission issues, we make sure the entire WC is "group-owned" by the developers' group, and make sure everything is group-writable (may require some umasking).
I guess this sort of WC-sharing should be fine, shouldn't it?
I agree though that for "normal use" (i.e. development, making lots of changes concurrently, ...) WC sharing is not a good idea.
Johan
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
I am not sure exactly what the issue is. However, users should never
Why are these users sharing a working copy?
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Andrey Repin <anrdaemon_at_freemail.ru> wrote:
-- David Weintraub qazwart_at_gmail.com ------------------------------------------------------ http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=1984927 To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org]. ------------------------------------------------------ http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=1987076 To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].Received on 2009-04-30 01:22:59 CEST |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.