>
Linedata Services (UK) Ltd
Registered Office: Bishopsgate Court, 4-12 Norton Folgate, London, E1 6DB
Registered in England and Wales No 3027851 VAT Reg No 778499447
-----Original Message-----
> From: marc gonzalez-carnicer [mailto:carnicer.lists_at_gmail.com]
> Sent: 28 April 2009 12:00
> To: Olivier Sannier
> Cc: users_at_subversion.tigris.org
> Subject: Re: How to merge works done on various branches ?
>
> hi,
>
> 2009/4/27 Olivier Sannier <obones_at_free.fr>:
> > Please read the documentation, it explains all this and much more.
>
> yes, read it please. but sometimes an example over a concrete
> example and need can be very educative. see below for a quick
> reply to your quick questions.
>
>
> >> 1) While at revision 9, I detect for example that the
> modifications
> >> done on revision 3 are not correct, and I'd like to remove
> them. Is
> >> there a "quick" way to do this ? I've identified a way,
> selecting all
> >> the files not modified on rev 4, 6 & 9, making a revert to
> rev 2, but
> >> it is a bit painful to do it manually. For the files also
> touched by
> >> at least one of the next revision, I redo manually also
> the operation.
> > Reverse merge :
> >
> http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.5/svn.branchmerge.basicmerging.html#s
> > vn.branchmerge.basicmerging.undo
> >
>
> before starting, it's much better to check you have no local changes.
>
> assuming you are on the trunk directory ...
>
> $ svn merge -c -3 <TRUNK_URL> .
>
> please do notice the '-' and the '.'
>
>
> >> 2) While at revision 9, I detect that the modifications
> done on rev7
> >> on the branch (and only them, not the ones done on rev 5
> and 8) are
> >> interesting to be added on the trunk for the next software
> delivery
> >> for example. Is there a "quick" way to do this ?
> > Cherrypicking :
> >
> http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.5/svn.branchmerge.advanced.html#svn.b
> > ranchmerge.cherrypicking
>
> again assuming you are on the trunk directory ...
>
> $ svn merge -c 7 <BRANCH_URL> .
>
>
> it's also possible to use -r instead of -c. in the first case
> -r 2:3, in the second -r 6:7.
Actually the first would be -r3:2, as it's a reverse merge
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=1963111
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-04-28 14:01:20 CEST