[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: @REV vs -r REV

From: Andrey Repin <anrdaemon_at_freemail.ru>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 03:47:33 +0400

Greetings, Zing!

> Thanks for the script.sh, I understand now. For your script, subversion
> COULD in theory return what you are looking for: the contents of file2_at_4,
> but the current algorithm can't (it's explained in the peg rev section of
> the book).

> But, things get complicated very easily. If you then do:

> $ svn cp file://$repos/file1_at_1 file3
> $ svn ci -m 'Commit 5'

> Now what answer would you expect when you run:

> $ svn cat -rHEAD file://$repos/file1_at_1

Yes, I though about that the other day...
No immediate solutions, though... too tired right now.

> Both file2_at_5 and file3_at_5, have lines of history back to file1_at_1. You just
> can't pick one of the two and show that, although I suppose you could
> display both, but I rather not think about trying to support that. :)

Well, right, but still, there could be more transparent log for
And more transparently accessible. I'll think about it, when I get time.

 Andrey Repin (anrdaemon_at_freemail.ru) 23.04.2009, <3:45>
Sorry for my terrible english...
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-04-23 01:52:33 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.