Re: @REV vs -r REV
From: David Weintraub <qazwart_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 11:57:36 -0400
All this talk of -r<rev> vs. @<rev> reminds me of something the
In ClearCase parlance, Evil Twins are two different files in two
For example:
Create a new repository and add a directory called foo with a file
Your repository looks like this:
foo/foobar.txt
Now create a directory called bar that is a sibling of foo and move
Your repository looks like this:
foo/
Now create a new file called foobar.txt under the foo directory.
foo/foobar.txt
To our mortal eyes, we assume that foo/foobar.txt in Rev 1 of the
If I do a log on foo/foobar.txt, I don't see that there was a file
$ svn diff -r1 foo/foobar.txt
If, however, I do this:
$ svn diff -r1 foo/foobar.txt_at_1
This works because I am now specifying not the file, but the file of
ClearCase administrators dreaded Evil Twins because they caused so
-- David Weintraub qazwart_at_gmail.com ------------------------------------------------------ http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=1862442 To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].Received on 2009-04-22 18:06:18 CEST |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.