[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: Re[2]: Performance of SVN on Windows and Linux

From: Bob Archer <bob.archer_at_amsi.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 11:41:09 -0400

> DW> The biggest problem with Windows is the virus scanning software.
When
> DW> you checkout 1000 files, Windows scans each of those for viruses.
Then
> DW> of course, there are 1000 copies of all the files in the .svn
> DW> directory which Windows also scans. Then, there are all the
properties
> DW> and other files in the .svn directories that also get scanned.
>
> It seems your imagination of Virus scanning schemes a bit outdated...
> Like, 8
> years old.
> Normal monitoring antivirus scan each file only once - at the creation
or
> modification. And that does not take long time for single file.
> Then it forget about it. Reading from file, executing it will
> never trigger a scan unless you specifically told to do so, or other,
non
> FS-related issues arise in process (Memory access to the different
> process,
> IRQ table manipulation, etc).

He did say "on checkout" which is certainly file "creation" which will
trigger the virus scan. Personally I just exclude my c:\Development from
McAfee and it keeps it's grubby hands off my WC's.

BOb

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=1520437

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-04-02 17:42:00 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.