[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Re: Performance of SVN on Windows and Linux

From: Erik Huelsmann <ehuels_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 14:15:07 +0200

On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 7:35 AM, Abhishek J Kanitkar
<abhishek.kanitkar_at_kpitcummins.com> wrote:
> Thanks a lot David for this detailed explaination.
> To be specific, I would like to ask you if we have SVN repository of 40GB how it will be managed on Windows 2003 Server and Linux Server ?
> What problems do you think may come up with either Windows 2003 Server or Linux Server?
> Please inform me about this.

Please don't post with the same mail in response to every person
replying to you. People will read your other mails; that's the purpose
of a mailing list.

To answer your question: Subversion is not a resource hog. Most
Subversion servers in this world spend their cycles in idle time.
However, there are setups which are extremely busy. So, the answer to
your question is: you need to test and see what the effect of your
usage pattern is.




To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-04-02 14:19:56 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.