[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Updates and Checouts Failing...

From: <kmradke_at_rockwellcollins.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 11:48:59 -0500

David Weintraub <qazwart_at_gmail.com> wrote on 03/27/2009 11:21:05 AM:
> I'm not too worried about a Denial of Service Attack since this server
> is behind a firewall and is unreachable via The Tubes.
> Of course, if someone really wanted to do a DOS attack on our clients,
> they'd let us install our software (RIM SHOT!)... But, seriously
> folks!
> I've increased the timeout from 120 seconds to 240 seconds (these are
> seconds. Right?). I was worried if this was too much, but I can see
> from your example that you increased this to 1200 seconds or about 20
> minutes.

Yes, that value I have is extremely large to workaround this
issue for gigantic files on very slow access devices...

> I've found a bit more information going on. From what I read, this
> seems to be a problem with directories that contain lots of files and
> with Windows SP3. And, yes, it is happening on our Windows SP3 and in
> a directory with lots and lots of files in it. We'll see if this
> helps.
> Anyone else ran into this issue or has modified their Timeout setting on
> And, what is the official Subversion policy of the Apache "KeepAlive"
> setting. By default, this is off. Should I turn it on for a Subversion
> server?

I have keepalive on (with a much smaller timeout of 5 sec). I think
this is mainly because I was testing some connection oriented
authentication stuff, but it might improve some other situations
as well...

Kevin R.


To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-03-27 17:50:11 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.