svn merge ignored a revision
From: Todd C. Gleason <tgleason_at_impac.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 09:18:34 -0700
This is a corner case, and may be well-known, but I wanted to mention it
I recently ran a merge from a branch to the trunk, identifying all the
Trunk Branch
R1059 modified (several
R1210 modified (file X
R1963 modified (several
R1977 merged including r1968
Merge info supports this BUT
I manually modified the commit
to include R1059 changes
made in file X ONLY
and did not update mergeinfo
(see below).
R2037 modified (file X)
R2189 final merge from branch,
specifying R1059 and R1210 but not R1963.
R1210 changes did not merge in.
svn said:
--- Merging r1059 into '.':
C file X
--- Merging r1210 into '.':
G file X
Conflicted filenames looked like
file X.merge-left.r1058 and
file X.merge-right.r1059
Resolved conflicts. Manually integrated R1210.
Server: Svn 1.5.2 under Apache with NTLM running on Windows 2003
Client: Svn 1.5.5 under Windows XP using https. (http-library = serf)
So the question is: Did my manual merge of r1059, without updating
I'm also worried by the fact that, after I made the related R1059 and
So the problems I see here are:
1. The granularity at which you can run a merge. On occasion I
Is there anywhere that it looks like I made an error?
Also, I'm curious whether a svn 1.60 client and/or server improves this
Todd C. Gleason
Senior Software Development Engineer
ELEKTA, Impac Software
719-481-1131
www.impac.com <http://www.impac.com>
------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.