[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Sparse Directories vs Externals

From: Stephen Connolly <stephen.alan.connolly_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:24:06 +0000

but if you copy them in, you loose the history

I prefer to svnsync 3rd party repos that I'm depending on and then
have the external point to my copy (or use sth like tailor to sync
only a subset of the repo)

Sent from my [rhymes with myPod] ;-)

On 25 Feb 2009, at 16:30, void pointer <rcdailey_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Bob Archer <Bob.Archer_at_amsi.com>
> wrote:
> You can use svncopy.pl which will pin your externals in the tag to
> the current revision that you tagged from.
> Pinning externals isn't the same as replacing externals with an SVN
> Copy. I like the latter the best. It keeps tags more independent and
> they are less prone to breaking.


To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-02-25 19:35:59 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.