Hello Ryan,
Did you get a chance to look into this? Should I report this as a bug
request on the Subversion website?
Thanks,
Vinay
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 2:10 PM, vinay i <vinay.indresh_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes. Please follow the below steps to reproduce the behavior. Do you think
> it is bug or am I missing something?
>
> Thanks,
> Vinay
>
> /indreshv/duplicate> svn checkout file:///indreshv/test/trunk/src/java
> java1
> A java1/a.java
> A java1/b.java
> A java1/c.java
> A java1/d.java
> A java1/new.java
> Checked out revision 153.
> /indreshv/duplicate> svn checkout file:///indreshv/test/trunk/src/java
> java2
> A java2/a.java
> A java2/b.java
> A java2/c.java
> A java2/d.java
> A java2/new.java
> Checked out revision 153.
> /indreshv/duplicate> cd java1
> /indreshv/duplicate/java1> ls
> a.java b.java c.java d.java new.java
> /indreshv/duplicate/java1> svn delete new.java
> D new.java
> indreshv_at_invest1:/u/indreshv/duplicate/java1> svn commit -m "deleting
> new.java" .
> Deleting new.java
>
> Committed revision 154.
> /indreshv/duplicate> cd java2
> /indreshv/duplicate/java2> ls
> a.java b.java c.java d.java new.java
> /indreshv/duplicate/java2> svn delete new.java
> D new.java
> /indreshv/duplicate/java2> svn commit -m "deleting new.java again" .
> Deleting new.java
>
> Committed revision 155.
>
> /indreshv/duplicate/java2> svn log file:///indreshv/test -v -r154
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> r154 | indreshv | 2009-02-16 13:29:18 +0530 (Mon, 16 Feb 2009) | 1 line
> Changed paths:
> * D /trunk/src/java/new.java*
>
> deleting new.java
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> /indreshv/duplicate/java2> svn log file:///indreshv/test -v -r155
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> r155 | indreshv | 2009-02-16 13:29:58 +0530 (Mon, 16 Feb 2009) | 1 line
> Changed paths:
>
> deleting new.java again
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 5:46 AM, Ryan Schmidt <
> subversion-2009a_at_ryandesign.com> wrote:
>
>> On Feb 10, 2009, at 12:49, vinay i wrote:
>>
>> Probably many of you would be aware of this. Assume I have a older
>>> checked out copy and another developer did a "svn delete" and "svn
>>> commit" on a particular file in his checked out copy of the same
>>> repository. Now, if I perform "svn delete" and "svn commit" on the
>>> same file without doing "svn update" it still allows me to commit.
>>> This is something which we don't expect to happen. Is there any
>>> standard procedure to avoid such commits?
>>>
>>
>> I wouldn't have expected that. Do you have a reproduction recipe we can
>> try?
>>
>>
>
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=1180768
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-02-17 21:14:25 CET