it may sound rude, but nevertheless I answer you: "You get what you paid
With this background, mentioning the salaries of the collab.net
sponsored developpers for subversion is a shame.
Also, comparing with a commercial product is inappropriate. Open source
always takes longer to come up with a good "product". But is most often
the better and much longer lasting one.
Additionally, you seem to have a lot of experience in the development,
test and release of a bigger software package. Otherwise I can't imagine
why you suggest implementing a really major code change simply weeks
before release after a several month development period.
Sorry for the sarcasm.
Listman wrote on 17.02.2009 8:06 Uhr:
> its just a shame that we've had so much push-back from the svn
> developer community
> on the issue of performance (do i need to go and dig up that thread
> Hyrum?) and now
> when someone identifies a root cause and a possible fix it gets pushed
> back another
> 6 months.
> performance is the MAIN issue with Subversion, with large wc's
> is just horrible.. the Perforce folks look at our performance and
> laugh, there are
> examples of this all over this list..
> it seems a little arrogant of the developers to ignore this issue,
> don't user
> concerns count for anything?
> Collabnet are paying the salaries of a number of people on the dev
> list, aren't
> they concerned that Atlassian are kicking their butts because of this
> performance issue?
> Am I alone here? Hello?
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-02-17 08:31:21 CET