Re: Subversion/Eclipse Performance on Windows

Bob Archer wrote:
>> For the case of Java, however, Microsoft was actually very friendly to
>> the technology (for awhile). Their Java compiler and VM for Windows
>> were the fastest around. But this was in the 1990s, and Microsoft's
>> attitude toward Java has changed considerably since then.
>
> IIRC Sun didn't want MS shipping a JVM... especially one superior to the
> one Sun shipped. Nor did they want MS shipping a Java IDE which is why
> J++ was dropped. Sun's complaint was that if you used J++ apps wouldn't
> be cross platform which was only true if you used the Windows API
> extensions.

Which, if that was the only version of something-like-java that you
used, you would use because they were on by default and you wouldn't
know until you tested on a different platform that it wasn't portable.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
    lesmikesell_at_gmail.com
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=1075130
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].