[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: converting from SVN to CVS

From: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday_at_crashcourse.ca>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:24:45 -0500 (EST)

On Tue, 27 Jan 2009, Pat Farrell wrote:

> Toby Thain wrote:
> > CVS has been obsoleted. Migrating back to it is a very bad move.
> I've watched this thread with interest and horror. I can't imagine
> any reason to go back. There are good tools to bring CVS forward to
> SVN. Use them. Be happy

  i've seen a number of people claim that what someone is proposing is
to "go back" from SVN to CVS, but that's not what's happening. as i
understand it, the proposal is for the company to simply *stay* with
CVS, as opposed to upgrading. it's still a distasteful choice, but
it's not quite as horrifying as regressing from SVN to CVS.


Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry:
    Have classroom, will lecture.
http://crashcourse.ca                          Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-01-27 19:26:25 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.