Re: converting from SVN to CVS

On Tue, 27 Jan 2009, Pat Farrell wrote:

> Toby Thain wrote:
> > CVS has been obsoleted. Migrating back to it is a very bad move.
>
> I've watched this thread with interest and horror. I can't imagine
> any reason to go back. There are good tools to bring CVS forward to
> SVN. Use them. Be happy

  i've seen a number of people claim that what someone is proposing is
to "go back" from SVN to CVS, but that's not what's happening. as i
understand it, the proposal is for the company to simply *stay* with
CVS, as opposed to upgrading. it's still a distasteful choice, but
it's not quite as horrifying as regressing from SVN to CVS.

rday

--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry:
    Have classroom, will lecture.
http://crashcourse.ca                          Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
========================================================================
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=1059768
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].