Tony Butt wrote:
>> I cannot believe nobody run into this problem before. It is typical of CVS
>> servers to have multiple "modules" under one "repository", and multilple
>> "repositories" under one "root". A "CVS module" correspond to a subversion
>> repository. I cannot believe that people have hundreds of svn repositories
>> into one directory ?
>>
>> How do you address this ?
>
> You address it by not having one module or project be one subversion
> repository. Effectively you could make the top level directories of four
> subversion repository be equivalent to CVS modules, or you can impose
> any other tree structure you wish.
>
> It is trivial to divide a repository into separate projects, and manage
> multiple projects in a single repository. The most difficult part we
> found was finding a workable directory structure standard, getting 20
> software engineers to agree on it, and then enforcing it.
But then, doesn't this mean that any change in any of the project changes
the version for the whole repository ?
So if I have four projects inside one repository (and in our case, it is
more like 60 !), no project is made to one project for a year, while the
other projects are very active, the one project is now a revision N + 40,
while no change whatsoever has been made to it ?
Or am I confused ?
--
Yves.
http://www.sollers.ca/blog/2008/
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=1043220
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-01-22 15:51:25 CET