Re: svn:externals with a fixed revision

Matthew Gregory wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> This is my first post to this mailing list as I've only just started to
> use SVN.
So one thing you need to know is you have to do "reply all" to keep it
on the list.

Matthew Gregory wrote:
> Thanks for the reply,
> I am using the the syntax you mentioned (@1234) and it still contacts
>the server. Its not been too bigger problem for us as I thought it
>would have been so I don't mind living with it, I just couldn't
>understand why its doing it.
>
> Thanks,
> Matt
Ok I thought that might be the case. I forgot the more obvious answer
though, update has a --ignore-externals switch.

That said, keep with the @1234 syntax to guarantee that if something
gets moved, you still end up getting the tree you expect.

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=986853

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2008-12-18 21:21:41 CET