Great idea if you can do it. "Unfortunately" a few of us develop for
ASP.Net using Visual Studio... which last I checked doesn't run on
Linux. Oh well, maybe the VS 2010 will have a native Linux version. ;)
Until then, it would be nice to see some performance improvements for
the windows stack. When it the new .svn structure going to happen? Is
this slated for 1.6 or later?
Thanks... this has been a great thread.
BOb
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Weintraub [mailto:qazwart_at_gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2008 10:56 AM
> To: Mark Phippard
> Cc: Toby Thain; Hilco Wijbenga; users_at_subversion.tigris.org
> Subject: Re: Subversion/Eclipse Performance on Windows
>
> Thanks! This is the information I was looking for. I'm going to try
> the CollabNet Desktop -- Eclipse Edition. I also know to make sure
> that developers are using JavaHL (especially since we'd have to
> license SVNKit).
>
> We are going to be redoing our infrastructure. If we get rid of
> Microsoft Exchange and go with a more "Open" email and calendar
> provider, we wouldn't need Windows desktops for developers. Instead,
> we could have Linux machines which seem much faster with Eclipse.
>
> One of our developers took his desktop machine, installed RedHat, and
> then used an open VM to install Windows as a virtual machine. He does
> his development in Linux and uses the Windows side for Outlook and
> MS-Word. Maybe that's the way we should be going.
>
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 6:11 PM, Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com>
wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 6:01 PM, David Weintraub <qazwart_at_gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> I'm attempting to get this running on my machine. This is a dual
core
> >> Pentium with a gigabyte of memory. Checking out in Subversion via
> >> Eclipse Ganymede using the most recent copy of Subclipse and
running
> >> SVNkit took almost 13 minutes.
> >>
> >> A similar task on Linux via the command line takes about five.
> >> However, checking out from CVS was not much faster. It took about
10
> >> minutes. This is a big project (probably too big).
> >>
> >> I've tried a merge, and Eclipse crashed (probably needs more memory
> >> for its Java process. I'm attempting to try again.
> >>
> >> What I am trying to find out is who uses Windows
XP/Eclipse/Subversion
> >> combination and whether they also have performance issues. Do you
use
> >> Subversive or Subclipse? Do you use SVNKit or JavaHL (which doesn't
> >> seem available on my installation)?
> >
> > I'd say most users use it on Windows. JavaHL is preferred. This
Wiki
> > page explains how to get it working:
> >
> > http://subclipse.tigris.org/wiki/JavaHL
> >
> > Subclipse has to do more than a command line checkout as Eclipse
does
> > some stuff and the svn status of all items is calculated and cached.
> > So it is normal for it to be slower than the command line.
> >
> > For merge you should use CollabNet Desktop. This includes/works
with
> Subclipse.
> >
> > http://desktop-eclipse.open.collab.net/
> >
> > --
> > Thanks
> >
> > Mark Phippard
> > http://markphip.blogspot.com/
> >
>
>
>
> --
> --
> David Weintraub
> qazwart_at_gmail.com
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageI
d=
> 982891
>
> To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-
> unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=982928
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2008-12-11 17:55:26 CET