Inside network we use http and i really don't see a point in using ssl when
we are already behind secure network.
We do use ssl when it comes to accessing things from outside the network.
why you can not have both the things and let people decide what is good for
them or not; I really don't see a point in completely removing a
functionality which people like me were using from long time.
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 10:27 PM, <kmradke_at_rockwellcollins.com> wrote:
>
> news <news_at_ger.gmane.org> wrote on 08/29/2008 11:33:06 AM:
> > vishwajeet singh wrote:
> > > Question is not about safe or unsafe; I just want to know why
> > > functionality which was there previously is removed.
> >
> > You just said it: it was removed because it was unsafe.
>
> unsafe in some environments. If you are on a trusted lan,
> ssl encryption is just an unnecessary overhead on
> both the client and server. Or possibly your physical
> network is already encrypting traffic, so secondary
> encryption is not necessary...
>
> Kevin R.
--
Cheers,
Vishwajeet
http://www.singhvishwajeet.com
Received on 2008-08-29 19:50:58 CEST