[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn+ssh <-> svnserve <= speed concerns

From: Ulf Seltmann <seltmann_at_digitalzone.de>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:47:06 +0200

John Peacock schrieb:
> It all depends on what you want. If you want high performance *and*
> high security, you should probably be using Apache with SSL certificates
> (client and server).
I don't agree with that. I used apache2+ssl+httpauth, which is nearly
the same except for the certificates. i experienced a poor performance
in all svn-actions especially in merging where it took over 45minutes,
where svn+ssh (what i use now) takes fewer than a minute. The
server-usage decreased too. So my advice for performance and security is
undisputable svn+ssh

ciao

Ulf

[1]http://subversion.tigris.org/servlets/ReadMsg?listName=users&msgNo=80302

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-07-30 15:47:36 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.