On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 06:32:31 -0300
Tim Cook <timothywayne.cook_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> I didn't plan ahead well enough and now I am faced with a merge
> situation that I'm not sure how to handle best.
>
> I have a project in svn (http://www.openehr.org/svn/ref_impl_python/)
> that only I have been committing to. I am now running a workshop and
> I had seven people checkout from the TRUNK/oship directory onto a
> local machine. Now they are all making changes but I do not want
> them to commit to the TRUNK. I created a BRANCH for the workshop
> that is now at the same revision as the TRUNK (but is newer than the
> version they all checked out). Each of the seven people now has
> commit access to the BRANCH/LNCCWorkshop directory.
>
> My thought was that I would have to take a copy of each persons code;
> export it to remove the revision info; create a BRANCH for each
> persons code; merge each one with BRANCH/LNCCWorkshop then have them
> do a new checkout of the BRANCH/LNCCWorkshop so they are all starting
> with the same code again.
>
> Is there an easier way to do this?
>
> Thanks,
> Tim
>
>
>
I think they should all just be able to 'svn switch' their working
copies into the BRANCH/LNCCWorkshop branch.
--
Mark K
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-07-29 01:52:15 CEST