From: "Mark Phippard" Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 2:40 PM
> On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 3:06 PM, Liviu <lab2k1_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> From: "Mark Phippard" Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 6:45 PM
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 7:44 PM, Daniel Becroft
>>> <Daniel.Becroft_at_supercorp.com.au> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Yes, it is what Erik said. The two are not mutually
>>>>> exclusive. There has been traffic on the dev@ list about the
>>>>> Windows binaries. The volunteers have been working on a new
>>>>> installer and just working out the kinks.
>>>>
>>>> Do you happen to know if there be a .zip file containing just the
>>>> command line executables, as there was for 1.4.x?
>>>
>>> Typically one user builds and posts the raw files and someone else
>>> packages them into an installer. So I think the answer is "probably".
>>> I have not heard anything to the contrary.
>>
>> I would assume the same build-then-package process applies to CollabNet's
>> release, too. However, if there is a binaries-only no-installer CollabNet
>> package, then that's not apparent on the download site. Is there maybe an
>> installer switch to just extract the contents?
>
> If you are asking if we have plans to make them available without an
> installer, the answer is No. We do not have any such plans.
This answers most of the question, thanks. The other part was about
installer switches - many setup packages have an option to unpack or create
an "install point" which essentially extracts the files without running the
actual installation. I was wondering if CollabNet's installer maybe had such
an option, too. I will assume the answer to that is negative as well.
Thanks,
Liviu
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-07-02 22:02:58 CEST