[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Something like vendor branches

From: Ryan Schmidt <subversion-2008b_at_ryandesign.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 16:12:07 -0500

On Jun 21, 2008, at 3:53 PM, Sergi Blanch i Torné wrote:

> On Saturday 21 June 2008 20:36:11 Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>> On Jun 21, 2008, at 12:52 PM, Sergi Blanch i Torné wrote:
>>> I'm trying to do something between usual branches but a half way to
>>> the vendor
>>> branches, without success.
>>> Mainly, the idea is to have two branches, one the public, another
>>> the
>>> development, and some time I want to synchronize them. But the
>>> issue is
>>> because I have to have it in different svn repositories.
>> It would be a lot easier if you had your branches in a single
>> repository. Why is this not an option for you?
> Yes, probably I miss much information. Little time a go I sing the
> assignment
> with the FSF to contribute in the elliptic curves development. This
> means in
> introduction time, during which I'll send patches to be verified if
> it work
> fine. I'm working with my svn server, but I want to update to the main
> branch. Does it have more sense?

It sounds like svn may be a better tool for that. It's build on top
of the Subversion libraries.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-06-21 23:12:35 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.