[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Svndumpfilter inconsistent behaviour in subversion 1.5

From: Blair Zajac <blair_at_orcaware.com>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 10:16:26 -0700

Hi Murli,

Not related to your post, but please don't reply to a Subversion question to
start a new thread, as it still is associated to the original question. So
people may miss your question if they don't read the original question. Read
this thread for more info.

http://subversion.tigris.org/mailing-list-guidelines.html#fresh-post

Regards,
Blair

Murli Varadachari wrote:
>
> I tried using svndumpfilter to split an existing repository. My intention
> was to keep the filtered revisions visible [ but empty ] and in the process
> retain the original revision numbers across the split repositories.
>
> I used the following commands
>
> svndumpfilter --drop-empty-revs ......
>
> I chose *not* to use "--renumber-revs" option.
>
> However after a dump and load into a new repository the revision numbers
> were re-arranged. I thought the "renumber-revs" was an explicit option -- it
> appears it is the default.
>
> Is there any way to prevent this [ or is this a bug}
>
> Cheers
> murli
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-05-27 19:16:56 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.