[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Fw: svnserve on W2K3

From: Laker Netman <laker_netman_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 13:12:18 -0700 (PDT)

[Oops, didn't realize this wouldn't auto-reply to the list...]

Well, actually just the opposite. I'm looking for help with the flat-file structures. I'm really not after AD integration at this point. I went from an Admin role in my last position to a Developer role now, in which I have autonomy over the repositories, but no general [network] security control. So, since I got a sandbox to play in, I'd rather just manage the minimal amount of security I need, myself.

Thanks for the response though. I'll take a look at the 1.5 beta docs and see if that may be a solution for the future.

Laker

----- Original Message ----
From: "Harvey, Edward" <Edward.Harvey_at_patni.com>
To: "users_at_subversion.tigris.org" <users_at_subversion.tigris.org>
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 2:25:19 PM
Subject: RE: svnserve on W2K3

> Can anyone recommend a complete guide for setting up svnserve
> (Subversion 1.4.6) on Windows Server 2003 (SP2)? In
> particular, I am having a heck of a time getting the security
> in svnserve.conf and authz structured correctly. I have
> googled this a lot and read several semi-detailed posts, but
> I can't find one that definitively says authorization works
> as it should in Windows-land. FWIW, I'm stuck with IIS and no
> DAV, so svnserve is my only choice (yes?).

Let's clear one thing up first. You seem to want domain-based, automatic client authentication, via active directory / kerberos, right? This does not work if you are using svnserve 1.4, so you'll have to wait till at least when 1.5 is released. For now, if you're using 1.4, the only authentication on svnserve is stored in a plain-text flat file on the server, so it essentially means that the sys admin must assign the password for each user.

Correct, everyone?

For now, if you want kerberos authentication, single sign-on, users choose their own passwords, then apache is the preferred method, but you could also consider svn+ssh, or IIS. Right everyone?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_subversion.tigris.org

      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ

      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-03-20 21:12:41 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.