John Peacock wrote:
> Geoffrey wrote:
>>> Just wondering, but what do you need that info for?
>>
>> Just trying to figure out who the guilty party is. ;)
>
> If you weren't using shared working copies, you would know who the
> guilty party was based solely on the output from 'svn log'.
We are not using shared working copies. There are two folks who are
permitted to update the production environment. To control this, they
are in a unique group, thus updating the files can only be done if
you're in this group. Each individual has their own working copies in
their own development environment.
> If you
> simply must use a shared working copy (which is a bad idea from the get
> go, but useful in certain limited circumstances), then you should make
> the following changes:
>
> 1) remove all files from the directory ~/.subversion/auth/svn.simple on
> the box that has the shared WC (I don't off the top of my head know
> where that might be located on a Windows box);
>
> 2) edit the file ~/.subversion/config (ditto on location), and in the
> section labeled [auth], uncomment this line (remove the # sign):
>
> store-passwords = no
>
> Now, every time someone commits, they will be forced to type their
> username and password.
It's not the committing of code were are trying to track. We know who
committed the code. We are trying to figure out who executed the 'svn
update' on the production machine.
--
Until later, Geoffrey
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
- Benjamin Franklin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-03-04 18:18:05 CET