Thank you for the reply Nick,
'X' item is unversioned, but is used by an externals definition
>
So, basically this means that this item is being fetched through
svn:externals... and also means that any modifications to these items will
not go back to their repos?
Thanks,
Marcelo.
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 8:42 AM, <nicklist_at_planet.nl> wrote:
> Hi Marcello,
>
> See svn help stat. X doesn't mean deleted:
>
> 'X' item is unversioned, but is used by an externals definition
>
> Hth,
>
> Nick S.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marcelo de Moraes Serpa [mailto:celoserpa_at_gmail.com<celoserpa_at_gmail.com>
> ]
> Sent: Thu 2/14/2008 11:29
> To: users_at_subversion.tigris.org
> Subject: Changed svn:externals and deleted the old fetched packages
>
> Hello,
>
> Some packages I use in svn:externals changed their repositories and hence
> I
> had to change the URLs in the property. Then I committed the changes to
> the
> svn:externals property.
>
> AFAIK, the old svn:externals-checked-out packages had .svn metadata that
> pointed to the previous repositories. What I did was to rm -rf these
> packages and then do a svn update to get the same packages from the new
> URLs.
>
> However, I'm getting the following when I run svn st:
>
> X src/zc.resourcelibrary
> X src/dtportal.policy
> X src/dtportal.ecommerce
> X src/dtportal.theme
> X src/ore.xd
> X src/five.intid
> X src/zc.table
> X src/ore.viewlet
> X src/getpaid.core
> X src/getpaid.wizard
>
> These are the packages that are fetched via svn:externals. They are there
> but svn is pointing out here that they have been deleted? Did rm -rf
> messed
> with the repo.?
>
> Any hints would be greatly appreciated :)
>
> Thanks.
>
>
Received on 2008-02-14 11:50:10 CET