> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: Jonathan Ashley [mailto:jonathan.ashley_at_praxis-his.com]
> Enviado el: miércoles, 13 de febrero de 2008 17:20
> Para: 'Chris Morris'
> CC: 'users_at_subversion.tigris.org'
> Asunto: RE: SSPI vs. AD/LDAP authentication
>
> 01234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123
> 456789
> >I set up a new SVN server at my shop and found info on how to configure
> >it for LDAP - Active Directory, and eventually got it working.
> >
> >This morning I was browsing the web and found ways to configure Apache
> >with an SSPI module, and was wondering if there were any pros/cons to
> >either approach (esp. with some Mac/Linux clients in the mix).
>
> I found it very difficult to get LDAP working (not sure I managed it at
> all), but SSPI was dead easy. So that would be an advantage if you
> were starting from scratch and Windows-only. If you've cracked the LDAP
> problem, and you're in a mixed environment, then I guess that won't
> apply. I also have some odd authentication problems which I attribute to
> SSPI, but it's possible LDAP would have been just as troublesome.
>
> regards,
> --
> Jon Ashley
>
>
Hi,
My experience is a bit different.
I found easy to get SSPI (not) working, since I got a lot of authentication errors. I was not able to find a configuration working fine. So I tried LDAP and after some hours tweaking and testing it works nice! I have a Windows environment with A.D. and path based permissions. I only had a headache with an Apache bug related to LDAP, but there is a patch for 2.2.6 version and the last version seems to resolve that.
Regards,
Xoan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-02-13 17:34:23 CET