[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Request: svnserve auth vs. system

From: Greywolf <greywolf_at_starwolf.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 15:15:48 -0800 (PST)

[Thus spake Brian A. Seklecki ("BAS: ") 4:16pm...]

BAS: On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 12:45 -0800, Greywolf wrote:
BAS: > svnserve
BAS:
BAS: Heya greywolf, it's lava!

<waves hands a la Wallace from Wallace and Gromit>

Good GOD, when'd you get here?!?

BAS: So, svnserve doesn't already support PAM? That's really where this
BAS: should be headed *wink*. Just about everyone has PAM, except those poor
BAS: bastards in OpenBSD :-)

Yeah, I disable PAM as soon as I get the system installed. Hate it with
a passion purple enough to make purple look green. I'd rather see
it call standard auth which, if I recall correctly, calls out to PAM
only if it's present.

I don't want it present.

But that's a different array of pointers to functions returning pointers
to arrays of cans of worms...

BAS: Me -> Back to bsd-appliance

:)

BAS: Also I found:
BAS:
BAS: > Looking through the archives of the cvs list, there is an unofficial
BAS: > patch in the CVS issue tracker to hack PAM support into CVS. It
BAS: > doesn't seem to be in the mainline, even after 4 years or so of
BAS: > waiting in the issue tracker.

Heh. CVS is so last century. :)

                                --*greywolf;

--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-02-12 04:19:42 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.