[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Subversion on a SMB-Share

From: <Seb.ADIO_at_gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 21:00:30 +0100

Dear list,

I understand, that I should use a server solution. The problem is, that my manager wants a fast solution and has no server to use.

I have one question: Do I have to intepret the sentence "you can put your share on a network if using a FS-repository" so that I can put the data store onto the network but I should acess it only over svnserver/or httpd (single access - synchronisation is done by the server process) or does it really mean to be able to acess the share over a mounted way with multiple users?

I see problems in using the share directly, that each users is able to completely delete the share. And synchronisation over network file system is in my opinion also a problem. But I think I misinterpreted the sentence.

Thanks.

Sebastian

-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 18:04:17 +0100
> Von: "Erik Huelsmann" <ehuels_at_gmail.com>
> An: "Seb.ADIO_at_gmx.de" <Seb.ADIO_at_gmx.de>
> CC: users_at_subversion.tigris.org
> Betreff: Re: Subversion on a SMB-Share

> On 2/7/08, Seb.ADIO_at_gmx.de <Seb.ADIO_at_gmx.de> wrote:
> > Dear list,
> >
> > I should set up a subversion system on a network share (access by about
> 5 users). As I read in various documentations it should never be done with
> Berkley databases.
> >
> > But using a FSFS-repository with a network share is possible
> (Redbean-Tutorial). In the same document, it is recommended in the section "The Apache
> HTTP Server" to don't du so, because it "removes and layer of protection
> against the file system" (http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.4/svn-book.html,
> seee below)
> >
> > I know that the users are able to operate on the file system and be able
> to modify or delete files. But, it is a team of about 5 members.
>
> Even in teams of 5 members errors will be made (supposedly). This is
> not about trust only. It's also about protecting one of your single
> most valuable assets: your investments.
>
> What's the problem with using svnserve, for which setting up is as
> easy as executing 'svnserve -d' at server startup?
>
> > Has anybody of you experience or problems using a network share. I
> think, that especially corrupted network connections, file system permissions
> and multiple accesses can lead to problems because the system is accessed in
> the context of different users at the same time or has subversion a
> mechanism to avoid them?
> >
> > The problem is that we need a version management and setting up a server
> infrastructure can not be realized in the short of time.
>
> What do you mean by 'server infrastructure'? If you have a share, then
> can't the same machine be running the svnserve daemon?
>
>
> HTH,
>
>
> Erik.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_subversion.tigris.org

-- 
__________________________
E-Mail von Seb.ADIO_at_gmx.de
Ist Ihr Browser Vista-kompatibel? Jetzt die neuesten 
Browser-Versionen downloaden: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/browser
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-02-07 21:00:55 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.