[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Opinion: open source-"supported" CVS backup capabilities are very weak

From: Philip Bondi <pjbondi_at_SystemDatabase.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 22:20:50 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)

Open source-"supported" CVS backup capabilities are very weak. Simple
solutions require potentially high-bandwidth brute force techniques.

For personal purposes, I've recently investigated CVSUP, CSUP, CVSYNC
and DCVS.

CVSUP seems to be the reigning king. However, it is neither available
for RHEL5 nor Windows nor Solaris (SPARC) 10. It is supported on
BSD. So this is an RHEL4/BSD solution only. I used CVSUP
successfully for a couple of years on RHEL3 and Solaris 8. This
successful "experiment" ended in Dec. 2006 when I upgraded my SPARC
box to Solaris 10. It will be buried when I (imminently) retire my
RHEL3 server, in favour of my RHEL5 server.

The simple CVS repository backup solution using RSYNC works fine on
LANs or low cost WANs. However, a CVS TAG operation that affects a
large group of files will cause retransmission of entire RCS archive

The only widely-supported, multi-platform, open source, viable
solution for low-bandwidth repository backup is Subversion.

Over this Christmas break, my respect for CVS has been significantly
eroded. The open source community has (in my opinion) clearly turned
its back on CVS.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-01-07 04:22:13 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.