Re: Communication of LOCKS and CHANGES
From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2007-11-29 21:09:18 CET
kmradke@rockwellcollins.com wrote:
>> The part that I don't get is why you don't set needs-lock if your intent
Yes, but it can be set ahead of time without much harm, as soon as the
> It may be incorrect, but I have users that assume when the "get lock" is
They are 'made' aware if they try to commit against a locked file and
> I suppose I could write a hook script to disallow locks on non needs:lock
I'd hope that needing to lock files that aren't already marked
> I would like to still see the CHANGED status cached if possible, since
Didn't someone say that one or more of the GUI clients already does that?
-- Les Mikesell lesmikesell@gmail.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.orgReceived on Thu Nov 29 21:09:45 2007 |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.