[I'm sending a copy of this email to the users mailing list so everybody
can enjoy the fun.]
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> I was interested in trying your cvs2git stuff, per this email:
> http://marc.info/?l=git&m=118592701426175&w=2
>
> However, the 'make check' of cvs2svn fails at the moment (r4287), and
> your existing tarballs don't include any of the Git stuff.
>
> Is there a tag or known revision that doesn't have any bugs in cvs2svn
> itself, so that I can differentiate between bugs in cvs2svn itself, and
> bugs in the Git side?
>
> EXCEPTION: Failure: Symbol filled twice in a row
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/code/cvs2svn-trunk/svntest/main.py", line 1034, in run
> rc = apply(self.pred.run, (), kw)
> File "/code/cvs2svn-trunk/svntest/testcase.py", line 123, in run
> return self.func()
> File "./run-tests.py", line 2322, in double_fill2
> raise Failure('Symbol filled twice in a row')
> Failure: Symbol filled twice in a row
> XFAIL: run-tests.py 80: reveal a second bug that created a branch twice
> ...
It is a bit confusing, but "XFAIL" means that the test is known to fail.
The only tests that are currently "XFAIL" are minor issues and/or
planned enhancements that that are not yet implemented. AFAIK, the
current trunk version is even more stable than the last official
release. If you see any tests that "FAIL", *then* you should worry.
Of course there might still be bugs, especially the git part, which is
still quite new. So we'd be very happy to get feedback about how it
works for you, and especially comparisons (ease of use, quality of
conversion) with any other CVS -> git tools that you may have tried.
Michael
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Nov 29 16:25:59 2007