Re: 答复: Re: 答复: Re: 答复: Re: 答复: Re: filname too long for svn

On 11/26/07, 朱勃豪 <bohao@sunnorth.com.cn> wrote:
>
> Dear Erik,

> That's my guess. :)

Could you stop top posting. When inlining your comments *after* the
text they are related to, your posts will become easier to read for
those of us who have multiple conversations going on at the same time.
What's your guess?

> I will try it later. I don't believe a mature system like linux can not
> handle the long filename.

Wait a minute! You're using Linux? Then what's with the reference to
TortoiseSVN? Don't you think it's odd to compare behaviour of a
Windows based client with that of a *nix based one when trying to
diagnose an error which is generated by the Operating System?

IOW: you can't compare Windows errors with Linux errors. Yes, those
systems are not the same and each have their own peculiarities.
Subversion doesn't have a maximum filename length built in.

> But on the other hand, no one will use this
> filename unless it is a test pattern for filesystem and in my case, it is.
>
> So ... wait for a while to see whether it is the problem of relative path or
> absolute path.

From the confusion above I now think it doesn't have to do with APR or
Subversion. When you do a comparison between 2 clients, next time,
please be sure to include *all* differences you introduced into the
equation!

Hope that helps!

bye,

Erik
Received on Tue Nov 27 14:16:04 2007