[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Equivalent of "cvs rtag -F"

From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2007-10-30 20:21:43 CET

Matthieu Moy wrote:
> BRM <bm_witness@yahoo.com> writes:
>
>> Given that SVN is inherently different from CVS in its tagging
>> mechanism (and no amount of discussion is going to convince the devs
>> others - see the archives and you'll see what I mean), why not set up a
>> branch that students can submit their work to instead?
>
> Well, the problem is that we're trying to minimize the number of
> concepts the students will have to learn. "Branch" is still an
> advanced concept that I'd rather avoid.
>
> Well, since "branch" and "tag" are the same in SVN, it doesn't change
> much.
>
> Just to make sure I understand your proposal : In the flow you
> suggest, the students would run "switch" and then "merge"?

The difference between tags and branches in svn is simply a convention
that you don't commit to tags. However, since you don't really want to
enforce a freeze after the initial copy, you can just call it something
more appropriate like your ../submit/.. path. After the copy, the
student could switch there and continue to commit changes up to the
deadline.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
    lesmikesell@gmail.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Oct 30 20:21:54 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.