[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: concerning repository storage type

From: Andy Levy <andy.levy_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2007-10-19 17:33:34 CEST

On 10/19/07, nav@ciklum.net <nav@ciklum.net> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> i just realized, that i am lost in SVN repository type choice...
>
> Me and other team member make ASP.NET web site. I've created repository on
> development server and we use it to work simulteneously.
> BUT naturally I also need to use this remote storage as virtual folder (for
> IIS) to run the testing site...
> Does it mean that when creating repository, I need to indicate file storage
> type (not Berkeley), otherwise I will just have my files inside DB and won't
> be able to run anything...?
> What in common is a sense of using DB then?

FSFS doesn't allow you to see the files directly either (it's still a
database). You shouldn't be serving a website/app out of your
repository, either check out or export a copy to your IIS docroot and
keep that updated.

A very similar question is answered in the SVN FAQ. See
http://subversion.tigris.org/faq.html#website-auto-update

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Oct 19 17:33:57 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.